By Dr. Peter S. Ruckman
In an try and hijack the readership of the unique Scofield Reference Bible which retained the textual content of the licensed model, the editors of the recent Scofield Reference Bible replaced the textual content in their paintings in anything like 500 areas whereas claiming to post the licensed model; that's, they lied! simply because the “New” King James model smuggled the readings of the Revised regular model into the King James textual content, the hot Scofield Reference Bible smuggled the readings of the defunked American general model into the textual content of the licensed model. during this paintings, Dr. Ruckman exhibits you the place the editors of the NSRB lied approximately their textual content. And even if Oxford Press now publishes an version of the NSRB with the particular KJV textual content, they nonetheless print the altered textual content correct in addition to the recent variation, so the fabric during this paintings is suitable because it was once while it was once first released.
Read or Download About the New Scofield Reference Bible PDF
Similar criticism & interpretation books
Utilizing methods from the Hebrew interpretive culture to parent the particular occasions surrounging Jesus' dying, Bishop Spong questions the hitorical validity of literal narrative involved the Ressurection. He asserts that the resurrection tale was once born in an adventure that opened the disciples' eyes to the truth of God and the that means of Jesus of Nazareth.
At the back of the educational and innocently descriptive identify of this publication is to be came across the most explosive works of biblical scholarship to be released this century. definitely lots of those that learn it on its firs visual appeal have been by no means a similar back, and it signalled the tip of what had hitherto been a flourishing literature on 'biblical theology'.
This festschrift honors the paintings of Stanley ok. Stowers, a popular professional within the box of Pauline experiences and early Christianity, at the celebration of his sixty-fifth birthday and retirement from Brown college. the gathering contains twenty-eight essays on conception and heritage of interpretation, Israelite faith and historic Judaism, the Greco-Roman international, and early Christinity, a preface honoring Stowers, and a decide on bibliography of his guides.
Modeling Biblical Language offers articles with the various most recent scholarship utilising linguistic concept to the learn of the Christian Bible. The participants are all linked to the McMaster Divinity university Linguistic Circle, a collegial discussion board for offering operating papers in smooth linguistics (especially Systemic practical Linguistics) and bible study.
- Israel's Restoration: A Textual-Comparative Exploration of Ezekiel 36-39 (Supplements to Vetus Testamentum)
- Whose Bible Is It?: A Short History of the Scriptures
Extra info for About the New Scofield Reference Bible
6). That isn't even the problem. " In Isaiah 14:9, the "GRAVE" doesn't move, "SHEOL" moves, in the NSRB. " Why don't they translate it? The King James Bible translated it. "SHEOL" is a transliteration. Oh my! shades of Judge Russell! Notice the substitution of "SOJOURNERS" for "STRANGERS" in Isaiah 14:1--This, too, comes from the American Standard Version (1901). But nowhere do we find the ASV (1901) more clearly substituted for the Bible than in the book of Proverbs. If you want to see the ASV in all its ghoulish glory go to the book of Proverbs and watch.
Why, that would make C. I. Scofield turn over in his grave! Baptism a "sacrament"? Why, every Christian I ever talked to thought it was an ordinance. I wonder where E. I wonder where they ever got the idea that water baptism was a sacrament? Now just where do you think that could come from? Baptism a sacrament? Something SACRED? my, my! And what is "THY SERVANT" doing in Acts 4:27? " Why, that's the reading of the Revised Standard Version of the NCCC that denies the deity of the Lord Jesus Christ.
Well, tell me something, gentlemen, if heaven isn't "up" where is it? Paul was caught up, John was caught up, the calling out of the saints is "come up hither," and Christ was caught up. Where is up, son? You know what the trouble with this bunch of translators was? This bunch was scared to death by educated asses, and they were terror stricken to their heart and bones that people would think they weren't "scientific" and intellectual if they spoke of heaven as being "up" as Paul did. Now just for the record, those of us who believe that Book know we are going "up," and we can point to "up"; we know where "up" is in the physical universe of the twentieth century while Alan Shepard and John Glenn are sleeping.
About the New Scofield Reference Bible by Dr. Peter S. Ruckman